For years it has been standard practice in Texas for judges to appoint guardians ad litem to represent the interests of minor plaintiffs in settlements. Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 173, which governs the appointment of a guardian ad litem, requires that a conflict of interest exist between the minor and his parent or next friend who brings the lawsuit on behalf of the minor. A guardian ad litem should not be appointed if no conflict of interest exists, such as when the next friend or parent is seeks no damages on her own behalf. The fact that a parent has an obligation to pay for a minor’s medical expenses, standing alone, does not create a conflict of interest under Rule 173. See Ford Motor Co. v. Stewart, Cox, and Hatcher, P.C., No. 11-0818, __ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. 2013). When dealing with settlements involving minors, defendants and insurers should object to any unnecessary appointments of guardians ad litem and should verify that any guardian ad litem fee awards comply with the Rules.
Recent News
- Transparency in Coverage
- Touchstone Bernays - Touching Lives in a Big Way
- EIGHT TOUCHSTONE BERNAYS ATTORNEYS NAMED TO THE 2019 TEXAS SUPER LAWYERS LIST
- TOUCHSTONE BERNAYS ATTORNEYS HAVE BEEN SELECTED TO THE 2019 TEXAS RISING STARS LIST
- NINE TOUCHSTONE BERNAYS ATTORNEYS NAMED TO THE 2018 TEXAS SUPER LAWYERS LIST
Recent Blog Posts
- MORE ON INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES
- TOTAL DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY DOES NOT PREVENT A RECOVERY FOR LOSS-OF-USE DAMAGES OR LOST PROFITS
- STAY TUNED: A FIFTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS PANEL........
- APPLICATION OF WATER-DAMAGE EXCLUSION IN ALL-RISK HOMEOWNER'S POLICY
- MEDICAL SERVICES EXCLUSION PRECLUDES COVERAGE